Anti-Terrorism Legislation

Legitimacy and power would be best represented by the recent anti-terrorism legislation of March 2005. The previous anti-terror laws expired on March 15th, 2005. They, therefore, needed to be replaced by an act more relevant to the country’s needs four years after 9/11.

The government got the acts of 2000 and 2001 swiftly through Parliament, primarily on the back of the aftershock of the terror outrages in America.

The legitimacy for the 2000 and 2001 acts came from the fact that it was legislation that came from a government as elected by the people in 2001 via Britain’s democratic electoral system whereby every 5 years registered voters can express their political will at the ballot box.

anti-terrorism legislation

anti-terrorism legislation

Regardless of the quirks of Britain’s electoral system, it is the system that we have and we have to work with it. That system gave the current government an overwhelming parliamentary majority and in line with representative democracy, the acts were passed through the Parliamentary system and came into force in 2000 and 2001.

In February to March 2005, the government found that the power that it has can be curbed by the democratic system that exists within Westminster.

Even with its mighty majority in the Commons, the government faced a major backlash not just from the opposition but also from many in its own ranks. However, the bills passed its first reading in the Commons and moved onto the Lords. After several sittings in both houses that lasted well into the early hours, an act did receive the Royal Assent and became law before the 2000 and 2001 acts expired. The final act was not what the government, with its large parliamentary majority, had originally wanted.

As a result of the democratic procedures laid down by Westminster, the 2005 Anti-terror Law does have legitimacy as it was voted for and supported by both Commons and Lords.

European Parliament: Members

Members of the European Parliament have the power to approve, amend or reject nearly all European Union legislation. Members of the European Parliament can hold the European Commission to account and can force members of the Commission to resign. MEP’s also decides on the European Union’s budget and can influence how EU money is spent.

MEP’s represent a much larger constituency within their respective country than a British MP would, for example. Each MEP is voted for by his/her constituents though turnout for these elections in some countries within the EU has been low. As with his British counterpart in the House of Commons, the primary function of a British MEP is to represent the views and concerns of his/her constituents in the European Parliament. However, when a vote is taken there is no guarantee that a MEP will vote as his/her constituents would have wished. While MEP’s might express the views and concerns of their constituents within the European Parliament, they have the right to vote as they see fit on an issue. Try visiting this great website.

european parliament

european parliament

A MEP is elected every five years. Elections for the European Parliament are based on proportional representation.
MEP’s can also sit and work within any one of twenty specialist policy committees. These twenty committees are:

  • Foreign Affairs
  • Development
  • International Trade
  • Budgets
  • Budgetary Control
  • Economic and Monetary Affairs
  • Employment and Social Affairs
  • Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
  • Industry, Research and Energy
  • Internal Market and Consumer Protection
  • Transport and Tourism
  • Regional Development
  • Agriculture and Rural Development
  • Fisheries
  • Culture and Education
  • Legal Affairs
  • Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
  • Constitutional Affairs
  • Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
  • Petitions

The Cost And Convenience Of Airport Parking

When travelling, there are a lot of things that we should sort out. If you are just like me who loves to personally drive to the airport, then most likely you will be thinking of the most convenient space to park the car. Good thing airport parking is available, but before we take advantage of airport parking there are a few things we need to consider. Thankfully there are several sites that offer help regarding parking at airports. If you need to park at one of the biggest airports in the world, I would recommend you to take a look at: smart parking schiphol.

 On-site parkingFirst and foremost, we have to make sure that we park our precious car in the most convenient position. On-site parking is the best choice because it is situated close to the departure desk. It is actually just a few minutes away from the actual check in location. However, on-site parking can be quite expensive. The airport usually charges per day, but booking ahead of time can help us find great saving deals.

 Personally, I find on-site airport parking way too expensive. What I usually do in order to save money is that I compromise a bit of convenience. I prefer to choose a slightly less convenient location as it enables me to save reasonable amount of money. I look for off-site airport car parks, which are situated a few miles from where I really need to check in. I find it really convenient and money saving though because I don’t necessarily need to walk for long distances because off-site airport car parks offer free shuttle service.

The bus will pick me up from the car park and drop me back again when returning home. The off-site airport car park is more practical than on-site airport car park, especially when away for a week or so. The only downfall is that I need to arrive earlier to give ample time to travel from the off-site airport car park going to the check in area. It’s just a little sacrifice though as compared with the big savings.

Airport shuttle bus